James A. Ohlson(http://www.cfapubs.org/doi/pdf/10.2469/cp.v1998.n2.6) has derived quite a simple way of determining whether a company is over or under value by just using a few simple parameters on using Free Cash Flow(FCF)
1) Current FCF, the author used FCF = NOPAT - Change in Invested Capital, but I will use an easier format which is cashflow from operation - capital expenditure
2) Anticipate growth in FCF, use growth of sales to infer the growth rate of FCF, but I can also use the past 5 years FCF history to determine the growth rate of FCF.
3) Use modified dividend growth model and applied it to FCF, which is = Current FCF * (1 + Growth)/ (r- Growth)
4) Infer r by reverse engineering, which derive r = Growth + Current FCF/value of the firm(cash yield), where value of the firm = market cap of equity + net debt
5) Decide whether the stock is overvalue or undervalue by looking at r. If r is high, means it is undervalue, vice versa.
This illustrates that investor's expected return has two components: growth and cash yield. What a company does not generate in growth it must generate in current FCF, what it does not provide in current FCF it must provide in growth
I will use an example here to illustrate the formula, Franklin Resources(NYSE:BEN),
1) Current FCF of BEN = 2,566million
2) Growth in sales for the past 5 years = 14.8%
4) Value of firm (enterprise value) = 22,828 mil
5) r = growth + cash yield = 14.8% + 2.566/2,2828 = 26%
Relatively high r, so Franklin Resources is undervalue at this moment
Investment Journey of Hippo Fund
This is a blog detailing my investment thinking and philosophy. Please bear in mind that ALL ideas, opinions, and/or forecasts are for informational or entertainment value ONLY and should NOT be construed as a recommendation to invest, trade, or speculate in the stock market.
Monday, 1 June 2015
Friday, 1 May 2015
Business Model: To send money efficiently and
cheaply around the world with 510K locations. C2C represents 82% of revenue, geographical diversification of
revenue split across Europe(22%), North America(19%), Middle East and Africa (16% with 6% growth YoY),Asia Pacific(12%), Latin
& Central America(8%) and WesternUnion.com (4%, C2C E-commerce, with 31%
growth YoY in digital expansion).
C2B contributed 10% of revenue and Business Solution represents 7% of revenue.
Investment Thesis: 1) Price is low due to worry
of compliance cost(4.5% of its revenue), but cost will be normalized in the
future(FY14 guidance=3.5% to 4.0% of revenue), other competitors might not be
able to compete due to non-compliance issue(country specific) like adhere to
money laundering(for e.g. Barclays exited money transfer business in Jul 2013),
therefore strong economic moat will most likely enhanced in future due to
regulatory moat as shown by past average 5 years ROC = 643.5% 2) shareholder
friendly; generate around $1.1b of operating cashflow, with 61% used to do
stock repurchase and dividend payback 3) Strong distribution network, with more
than 510K locations worldwide, emerging market would still need brick and
mortar store to receive physical money with flexibility of doing price
adjustment if there is a competition, 4) e-commerce segment is growing, as well
as Business Solution segment(average 10% per quarter), 5) potential growth in
India, China, Mexico and the Philippines with workers needed to send money back
home. Remember spending money using credit
card (value for purchased items are relatively lower) and transferring money(notional
maybe large) are two different things. Need lower transaction cost, network
effect(brick and mortar), compliance and reputation(163 years of history) to be
in money transfer business.
Profitability & Financial
Ratio:
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
2013
|
TTM
|
2009-2013
CAGR
|
|
Revenue(USD
mil)
|
5084
|
5193
|
5491
|
5665
|
5542
|
5587
|
1.74%
|
Gross
Margin(%)
|
43.45
|
42.64
|
43.51
|
43.61
|
41.63
|
41.13
|
-0.85%
|
Operating
Margin(%)
|
25.23
|
25.04
|
25.22
|
23.48
|
19.98
|
19.4
|
-4.56%
|
Net
Margin(%)
|
16.7
|
17.52
|
21.22
|
18.11
|
14.41
|
14.04
|
-2.91%
|
Asset
Turnover
|
0.79
|
0.68
|
0.65
|
0.61
|
0.57
|
0.56
|
-6.32%
|
Equity
Multiplier
|
20.77
|
13.60
|
10.13
|
10.06
|
9.16
|
9.23
|
-15.11%
|
EPS(diluted)
|
1.21
|
1.36
|
1.85
|
1.7
|
1.43
|
1.44
|
3.40%
|
Free
Cashflow per share
|
1.64
|
1.32
|
1.6
|
1.51
|
1.51
|
1.52
|
-1.64%
|
Number of
shares(mil)
|
701
|
668.9
|
634.2
|
607.4
|
559.7
|
539.9
|
-4.40%
|
Dividend
yield(%)
|
0.53
|
1.30
|
1.63
|
2.77
|
2.93
|
3.00
|
40.77%
|
EV/EBIT
|
11.15
|
10.21
|
8.8
|
7.55
|
10.44
|
6.32
|
|
ROC(%,Greenblatt
definition)
|
646.85
|
648.75
|
701.98
|
674.78
|
545.52
|
526.96
|
|
Price to
Free Cash Flow
|
8.93
|
14.07
|
11.41
|
9.01
|
11.35
|
10.31
|
Peer analysis: Xoom is operating on an online
model only, trading at x128.7 P/E; Moneygram traded at 5.78 EV to EBIT but with
lower net margin of 7.29% and only 300K locations. Euronet has less than 150K
locations.
TTM
|
Moneygram
|
Xoom
|
Euronet
|
|
Revenue(USD$mil)
|
5587
|
1516
|
140
|
1485
|
EV/EBIT
|
6.32
|
5.78
|
75.84
|
19.51
|
ROC(%)
|
526.96
|
4.85
|
14.25
|
112.36
|
Net
Margin(%)
|
14.04
|
7.29
|
2.9
|
6.36
|
Asset
Turnover
|
0.56
|
0.31
|
0.49
|
0.91
|
Valuation: Traded at 6.32x EV/EBIT(10
years EV to EBIT range: 5.3 to 19.9); 10.31x P/FCF(10 years P/FCF range =6.69
to 28.69). Using earnings power valuation with no growth assumptionà 27% upside from current price
EBIT
Margin average for the past 5 years
|
0.230811
|
||
Average
Sales for past 5 years(mil)
|
5404
|
||
Average
EBIT(mil)
|
1247.304
|
Required
Return of Equity
|
9.00%
|
- Current
interest(mil)
|
174
|
Forecast
equity value(mil)
|
10603.38
|
- Current
tax(mil)
|
119
|
Amount of
outstanding share(mil)
|
539.9
|
Add: 3
years R&D
|
0
|
||
Earning
Power(mil)
|
954.3039
|
Fair value
of share(US$)
|
19.64
|
Risk: Low revenue growth; earnings hurt from strong
USD in short term; competition from Peer to Peer transfer and Mobile Payment;
economy downturn causes worker to lose job and then sending less money back
home. However operating margin maybe able to improve to 25% once the compliance
completed, thus offsetting the low revenue growth, with added bonus from
digital expansion in C2C channel.
Summary: Buying a high ROC (due to regulatory moat and
no high capex needed) company with a cheap price(temporarily low due to
compliance cost) will offer decent return in a long run.(credit to Joel
Greenblatt). Notable guru holdings: David Abrams(used to work with Seth
Klarman, 26.31%), Charles Bobrinskoy(Ariel Focus,4.8%), John Rogers(Ariel
Appreciation, 4.51%)
Friday, 2 May 2014
AP Oil
AP Oil(Code: 5AU, Price:S$0.20, Target Price:S$0.43, P/B= 0.8, P/E=6.3, market cap=S$32.9m)
Background: Incorporated in 1975(listed in 2001 and upgraded to mainboard in 2003), engaged in manufacturing of petroleum lubricating oil, including wholesale of oil and fuel, dealing in paraffin wax, lubricating oil grease. Manufacturing segment manufactures range of lubricating oil and fluids and specialty chemicals for industrial, automotive and marine applications, and providing blending services(61% of revenue). The manufactured goods were sold under the Company’s brand names. The trading segment trades in base oil and additives and specialty chemicals(19.5% of revenue). The franchising segment includes trades in raw materials for products under the Company’s brand names(19.7% of revenue).
Economic moat:
- Customized solution for industrial lubrication needs(metal working oil, stamping and forming oil, heat transfer oil, gear oil, hydraulic fluid, compressor oil, transformer oil etc) – Differentiated focus
- Strong R&D capability and focus on quality
- Brand name is established; relatively high switching cost(customer won’t risk damaging the machine if switch to another brand)
- Exported to over 20 countries; Singapore generated 64% of revenue(Bulk of the figure included marine lube delivered to foreign vessels at Singapore port and specialty chemical that sold to SG multinational companies and subsequently re-exported to other countries). Vietnam, Myammar and Bangladesh accounted for 25.6% of revenue.-->Emerging Market Exposure
Profitability Analysis:
2013
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
| |
Net Profit Margin
|
8.09%
|
5.26%
|
6.39%
|
4.21%
|
8.51%
|
Asset Turnover
|
1.33
|
2.08
|
1.63
|
2.09
|
1.73
|
Return on Asset
|
10.76%
|
10.92%
|
10.43%
|
8.78%
|
14.72%
|
Equity Multiplier
|
1.18
|
1.19
|
1.25
|
1.21
|
1.26
|
Return on Equity
|
12.73%
|
12.96%
|
12.98%
|
10.65%
|
18.51%
|
Piotroski F score
|
7
|
8
|
7
|
6
|
8
|
Profitability
| |||||
Positive Net Income
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Positive Operating Cashflow
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Increasing ROA
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Operating CashFlow > Net Income
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Liquidity, Debt and source of fund
| |||||
Increasing current ratio
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Decreasing ratio of long term debt to total assets
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
No increase in outstanding share
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Efficiency
| |||||
Increasing Gross Margin
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Increasing Asset Turnover
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Valuation: 1) Using residual income method: If ROE earning more than Required Return, then it should be atleast selling at the Book Value + Residual Income
2) Using FCFF: Assuming sales growth =2.3%, EBIT margin= 8.65%, WACC = 10%, long term FCF growth rate =2.47%, intrinsic value= S$0.43 per share
FREE CASH FLOW (FCF)
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2018
| ||
Profit after tax
|
3.496
|
3.612
|
3.749
|
3.872
|
3.904
| |
Add back depreciation
|
1.055
|
1.055
|
1.055
|
1.055
|
1.055
| |
Change in net working capital
| ||||||
Increase in operating current assets
|
-0.918
|
-0.338
|
-0.346
|
-0.354
|
-0.362
| |
Add increase in operating current liabilities
|
-0.947
|
0.129
|
0.132
|
0.135
|
0.138
| |
Subtract capital expenditures
|
-1.143
|
-1.145
|
-1.148
|
-1.150
|
-1.152
| |
Subtract increase in other assets
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
| |
Add back after-tax interest
|
0.026
|
0.025
|
0.007
|
0.005
|
0.097
| |
FCF
|
1.568
|
3.337
|
3.449
|
3.563
|
3.680
| |
Valuation
| ||||||
WACC
|
10.00%
| |||||
Long-term free cash flow growth rate
|
2.47%
| |||||
Year
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
2017
|
2018
| |
FCF
|
1.568
|
3.337
|
3.449
|
3.563
|
3.680
| |
Terminal
|
50.107
| |||||
Total
|
1.568
|
3.337
|
3.449
|
3.563
|
53.787
| |
Discounted value
|
44.685
| |||||
Add back initial cash
|
26.211
| |||||
Firm value
|
70.896
| |||||
Subtract total debt value
|
0.248
| |||||
Implied equity value
|
70.648
| |||||
Number of shares outstanding
|
164.53
| |||||
Implied value per share
|
0.43
|
Thesis for investing: Low P/B<1, Low P/E <10, No long term debt, ROE > 12% for the past few years. Solid F-score history(>=6) for the past few years. Cash per share = S$0.159
Risk: 3 major customers contributed 58.8% of revenue of 2012, 2 major customers contributed 40.63% of revenue of 2013; Low liquidity, same as the SG small caps, daily transaction lots around 50 lots, Optimum size of asset allocation 20-30K SGD, need to hold for long term(3 years+)
Family ownership: Ho Chee Hon, Deputy CEO, son of CEO, increase holdings from 1.83 mils shares to 3.16 mil shares with S$0.21 per share on 11th March 2014. Total percentage of share holding by CEO Ho Leng Woon, his wife and his son = 49.9%
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)